<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Earth Feed&#187; Zambia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.earthfeed.com/category/zambia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.earthfeed.com</link>
	<description>ecological dispatches from a small planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:50:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>From the Noosphere</title>
		<link>http://www.earthfeed.com/from-the-noosphere/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.earthfeed.com/from-the-noosphere/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Earth Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Noosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zambia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theearthfeed.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
From the Wall Street Journal, Russia&#8217;s do nothing climate plan. President Medvedev figures he can increase emissions by 30 percent and still be 15 percent bellow Russia&#8217;s 1990 figures.  While an absurd notion, the move illustrates why using a uniform baseline emission year can yield unfavorable results.


The UNDP has teamed up with AFP for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>From the Wall Street Journal, <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2009/06/23/russias-do-nothing-climate-plan/">Russia&#8217;s do nothing climate plan</a>. President Medvedev figures he can increase emissions by 30 percent and still be 15 percent bellow Russia&#8217;s 1990 figures.  While an absurd notion, the move illustrates why using a uniform baseline emission year can yield unfavorable results.</li>
<p><code><br />
</code></p>
<li>The UNDP has teamed up with AFP for the <a href="http://picturethis.undp.org/about">Picture This: Caring for the Earth </a>photography contest.</li>
<p><code><br />
</code></p>
<li><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8118880.stm">Bumper crop in Zimbabwe</a> proves famine is a political issue and not a production issue.</li>
<p><code><br />
</code></p>
<li>And finally, while it has nothing to do with climate change, it put a smile on my face.  And so: <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iqYrQoDYoScCG_yLybzE_YuxTXBg">Monkey urinates on Zambian </a>president.</li>
</ol>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.earthfeed.com%2Ffrom-the-noosphere%2F%20&amp;linkname=From%20the%20Noosphere"><img src="http://www.earthfeed.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.earthfeed.com/from-the-noosphere/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landgrabs for fuel</title>
		<link>http://www.earthfeed.com/landgrabs-for-fue/ </link>
		<comments>http://www.earthfeed.com/landgrabs-for-fue/ #comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Earth Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zambia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theearthfeed.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Thursday, Olivier De Schutter of the United Nations special rapporteur on the right to food warned that biofuels are contributing to mass land grabs in developing economies.  Green Inc has an interesting post in which Mr De Schutter notes that the safeguards adopted by the European Union in 2008 to protect agriculture against the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Thursday, <a href="http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/food/profile.htm">Olivier De Schutter</a> of the United Nations special rapporteur on the right to food warned that biofuels are contributing to mass land grabs in developing economies.  <a href="http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/12/biofuels-and-land-grabs-in-poor-nations/">Green Inc has an interesting post</a> in which Mr De Schutter notes that the safeguards adopted by the European Union in 2008 to protect agriculture against the onslaught of biofuels are “absolutely insufficient to monitor the impacts on the countries concerned by shifts in land use for agrifuels production.”  Instead major hedge funds continue to engage in land grabs that jepordize regional food security and undermine property rights.</p>
<p>The growing trend of converting agriculture lands to agrifuel lands is very real in the world&#8217;s poorest nations.  While in Lusaka last year I attended a colloquium where <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jatropha">Jatropha</a> was hailed as the miracle crop that would carry Zambia through an economic slump in the global price of copper.  At the time, Zambia&#8217;s petro prices had skyrocket above two dollars a liter, the most expensive in the region.  (The irony of course being that the nation shares a boarder with Angola.)  The benefits of petro-independence for the landlocked nation were awfully appealing.</p>
<p>A small but growing biofuel lobby was pressuring government officials to create strong incentives for farmers to convert their fields to fuel growing powerhouses.  Alas, the number&#8217;s simply didn&#8217;t add up.  Jatropha is tricky to grow. It&#8217;s productivity is variable, it&#8217;s yields unpredictable  Without subsidies the costs of production would exceed potential returns, meaning production of Jatropha would rely heavily on foreign aid dollars.  Dollars that could be spent on fertilizer for food-growing fields, or even food itself. (Never mind the fact that the general scientific consensus is that biofuel production is counter-productive due to it&#8217;s high demand on water and petro to grow crops.)</p>
<p>In a nation where many go hungry and the majority live on less than $1 a day, growing fuel instead of food simply doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.earthfeed.com%2Flandgrabs-for-fue%2F%20&amp;linkname=Landgrabs%20for%20fuel"><img src="http://www.earthfeed.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.earthfeed.com/landgrabs-for-fue/ /feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

